Anti-arthritic and anti-inflammatory effect of Cetylmyristeolate
against Freund’s adjuvant induced arthritis model
Kayalvizhi M.K.1*, Vanitha Samuel1, P. Nirmala1 and
K. Balamurugan2
1Division of Pharmacology, RMMC and H, Annamalai
University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram
2Department of Pharmacy, Annamalai
University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram.
ABSTRACT:
To evaluate the effect of Cetylmyristeolate (CMO) in Freund’s complete adjuvant
induced arthritis in rats. The experimental study was evaluated on male and
female Wister rats weighing (150 – 200gms). 0.5 ml of Freund’s complete
adjuvant (FCA) in the left tibiotarsal joint (IA) was
injected to induce arthritis, CMO-500mg; 1g and CMO100mg +
MSM200mg + glucosamine 500mg /day for 21 days were given. Paw edema
by plesthysmometer and arthritic index were studied,
the results showed
marked reduction of arthritic and inflammatory effect by CMO500mg/day and
1gm/day as well as the combination of 100mg/day + glucosamine 500mg and MSM
200mg /day. Percentage inhibition of paw volume edema was statistically
significant and reductions in the arthritic index scores were comparable with
reference standard drug dexamethasone. From the results of this
study, it was concluded that CMO as well as the combinations produced a
statistically significant effect in reducing carrageenan
induced arthritis in rats.
KEYWORDS: Cetyl myristoleate
(CMO), Glucosamine sulphate, Methyl sulfonyl methane (MSM), Dexamethasone,
Arthritis.
INTRODUCTION:
Rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder affecting 2% of the adult population.
Although the peak incidence of arthritis occurs between the ages of 35±45, the
prevalence of the disorder increases with age, due to the aggregate of early
and late onset cases(1). RA is characterized by intermittent are ups
of aching/burning joint pain. If untreated, the disease can ultimately result
in irreversible joint damage, disability and premature death. The causes of RA
are unknown, and there is no known cure for or prevention of the disease(2,
3). RA affects a disproportionate number of young- to middle aged adults,
but its impact on older adults may be greater, given an increased incidence of
concomitant disease for that population(4). Arthritis is thought to
affect more than 50 million Americans, and is generally accepted to be the
leading cause of movement limitation and disability. It deserves and receives a
great deal of research and medical attention. There are hundreds of drugs,
procedures, medical aids and devices directed at coping with the many
manifestations of the disease. Given this degree of complexity, certainly no
one agent alone could ever be expected to manage or cure "arthritis"
in its entirety (5, 6). Non steroidal antiinflammatory
drugs have been the main stay of treatment in both these conditions. But their
wide spread use is associated with significant toxic effects especially on the
gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidneys. The discovery of Cetyl
Myristoleate an ester of fatty acid natural substances
shown to be a less toxic and more effective means of achieving relief.
Freund’s complete adjuvant
induced arthritis in rats is an excellent experimental model and is well
documented (7, 8).
TABLE 1: CHRONIC STUDY FOR PERCENTAGE
INHIBITION OF PAW VOLUME
Groups |
Day 1 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 21 |
Two way ANOVA with repeated measures |
‘p’ value |
||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
|||
Group
I |
4.367 |
0.0516 |
4.367 |
0.0516 |
4.367 |
0.0516 |
4.367 |
0.0516 |
|
|
GroupII |
4.650 |
0.0548 |
4.833 |
0.0516 |
5.000 |
0.0894 |
5.183 |
0.0753 |
Group
‘F’ 90.926 |
0.000 |
GroupIII |
4.417 |
0.0408 |
4.567 |
0.0516 |
4.467 |
0.516 |
4.350 |
0.0548 |
Day =
95.140 |
0.000 |
GroupIV |
4.417 |
0.0408 |
4.533 |
0.0516 |
4.433 |
0.0516 |
4.350 |
0.0548 |
Day
79.288 * Group |
0.000 |
Group
V |
4.433 |
0.0516 |
4.600 |
0.0894 |
4.500 |
0.0894 |
4.400 |
0.894 |
- |
- |
GroupVI |
4.417 |
0.0408 |
4.517 |
0.0408 |
4.417 |
0.408 |
4.317 |
0.0408 |
- |
- |
N = 6
in each group, two way ANOVA, test Mauchly’s test, p
< 0.01 = s, P < 0.001 = HS
FIGURE 1: CHRONIC
STUDY FOR PERCENTAGE INHIBITION OF PAW VOLUME
TABLE 2: Results of arthritic index
Sl.No |
Treatment (P.O) |
Primary lesions |
Secondary lesions |
1 |
Control |
- |
- |
2 |
Freund’s adjuvantinduced |
++++ |
++++ |
3 |
Dexamethasone treated |
+++ |
+ |
4 |
Cetylmyristoleate
500mg |
+++ |
+ |
5 |
Cetylmyristoleate 1g |
++ |
- |
6 |
Cetylmyristoleate Methyl Sulphonyl
methane + Glucosamine |
++ |
+ |
++++ Maximum / Severe, +++ Moderate, ++
Mild, + Nil / Very mild, N = 6 groups
There are innumerable drugs for
manifestations of the disease yet; there remains an urgent need for finding pharmacological
therapies for arthritis which are effective, relatively safe and least toxic. By keeping the above
factors it was aimed to treat Freund’s complete adjuvant induced arthritis in
rats through a natural substance called Cetylmyristeolate
and compare its efficacy alone and in combination with other conventionally used preparations(9).
MATERIALS
AND METHODS:
Animals
The institutional Animal
ethical committee, RMMC and H (Registration No. 160/1999 CPCSEA) Annamalai University, Annamalai
Nagar, India approved the experimental design (proposal No. 549, dated
20.02.2008). A total of 36 albino Wistar rats of
180-200g were used for the study. Animals were housed in well ventilated room
(temperature 23 ± 2°C,
humidity 65 - 70% and 12h light / dark cycle, provided standard pellet feeds
and water ad libitum
at central animal house, Rajah Muthaih Medical
College and Hospital, Annamalai University. All
studies were conducted in accordance with committee for the purpose of control
and supervision on experiments and animals (CPCSEA) norms and the national
institute of Health guidelines “Guide for the care and use of Laboratory
Animals” (10).
MEASUREMENT OF CHRONIC INFLAMMATION
(Freund’s complete adjuvant induced
arthritis model)
Rats were
divided into six groups. Experimental Arthritis was induced by injecting 0.5 ml of
Freund’s complete adjuvant into the tibiotarsal joint
of left hind paw intrarticularly groups II to
VI. On the 1st day of the
study, the paw volume was measured by using volume displacing plethysmometer from day 1 to day 21 of the study. Test
drugs were administered to group-IV (CMO-500mg; group-V CMO-1g; group-VI
CMO-100mg + MSM-200mg+ glucosamine 500mg /day for 21 days; while group III
received the reference standard dexamethasone at dose
of 0.5mg/body weight/p.o for a period of 21 days, the
edema formation and percentage inhibition of paw volume were calculated on days
1,7,14 and 21 for all the groups. Rats Paw edema by plesthysmometer
and arthritic index were studied (11).
Discussion:
The mono articular arthritis induced by Freund’s adjuvant showed an
increased paw volume, which remained consistent throughout the study period in
group II, which was the non drug treatment. But
in group III to VI there was as statistically significant reduction in the
percentage inhibition of the paw volume edema (Table. 1 Figure. 1).The anti inflammatory activity (chronic study) in freund’s complete adjuvant induced arthritis at 2 doses of
CMO500mg/day and 1gm/day as well as the combination of 100mg/day + glucosamine
500mg and MSM 200mg /day was evaluated (12). The percentage inhibition of paw volume edema was
statistically significant in groups IV and V with maximal lowering being
observed in group VI. The reduction in the arthritic index (Table.
2). scores in groups VI were comparable with the effects observed
with dexamethasone in group III. CMO at both doses
showed a statistically significant reduction lower the arthritic index (Table.
2). It was presumed that CMO a medium chain fatty acid is not an
analgesic parse but reduces inflammation by normalizing hyper immune responses.
Prostaglandins play a significant role in different
phases of inflammatory response. In addition
inflammatory mediators such as 5HT and Kinins also
play a vital role. Like EFA’s CMO presumably turns off the fires of chronic
inflammation by serving as a mediator of prostaglandin formation and
metabolism. It was speculated that CMO stimulates the production of
prostaglandin series 1 and 3 which were known to suppress inflammation
(anti-inflammatory) unlike the series 6 prostaglandins were known to enhance
inflammation (pro-inflammatory). This probably accounts for its anti-
inflammatory action. As the exudative phase of
inflammation subsides, the initial stages of the reparative or third phase are
set in motion. The fibroblast, which is the dominant cell in the wounded zone first proliferates then synthesizes
extra cellular materials including new collagen fibers and acidic mucopolysaccride which are laid down to form new connective
tissue matrix(13).CMO facilitates cartilage building and also
serves as a surfactant/ lubricant for the damaged joints. Several studies have
documented the actions of Glucosamine, a mucopolysaccride
which prevents inflammation by decreasing the generation of superoxide radical
(14). MSM– a naturally
occurring nutrient also restores flexibility and permeability of the
cell wall thus aiding in the repair of worn out ligaments and tendons
(15).
Given alone these drugs produce mediocre results
and higher dose of these compounds such as glucosamine, given in 1 – 2gm / day
produces adverse effects. But this combination, selected on basis of varying
mechanism of actions, caused a profound, statistically significant lowering of
most serological parameters. This presumably potentiating effect of CMO was
observed even at the minimal dose ranges of 100 mg. From the results of this
study it was concluded that CMO, a acetylated fatty acid ester produced a
statistically significant effect in reducing adjuvant induced arthritis
(15).
Though the actual mechanism of action of
CMO as an anti-inflammatory agent is still hypothetical, its effect in reducing
the signs of inflammation and improving joint mobility with the least possible
adverse effects makes it a remarkable drug in the treatment of degenerative
conditions like OA and auto immune diseases like RA.
REFERENCES:
1.
Sorensen
LB, Blair JM. Rheumatologic diseases. In: Cassel CK, Cohen HJ, Larson EB, Meier
DE, Resnick NM, Rubenstein LZ, Sorensen LB, editors.
Geriatric medicine, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
p. 449.
2.
American
College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Clinical Guidelines, Guidelines for
the management of rheumatoid arthritis Arthr Rheum
1996;36:713±722.
3.
Task
Force on Taxonomy. Classification of chronic pain. In: H. Mersky,
and N. Bogduk (Eds.), Descriptions of chronic pain
syndromes and definitions of pain terms, 2nd ed., Seattle, WA: IASP Press, 1994
4.
Newman
SP, Revenson TA. Coping with rheumatoid arthritis. Baill. Clin. Rheum.
1993;7:259±280.
5.
Turesson C
and Jacobsson LT. Epidemiology of extra-articular
manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian Journal of
Rheumatology 2004; 33: 65–72.
6.
Bansback NJ, Young
A, Brennan A and Dixey J. A prognostic model for
functional outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology
2006; 33: 8.
7.
Vogal,
HG and Vogal, WH. Drug Discovery and Evaluation,
Springer – Verlag berlin
Heidelberg New York, 1997, P390.
8.
Pepys, MB., Hirschfied,
GM. (2003). “C-reactive protein: a critical Update”. J. Clin.
Invest. 11(12):1805-12.
9.
Harris
ED. The rationale for combination therapy of rheumatoid arthritis based on pathophysiology. J Rheumatol
1996;23(suppl 44):2–4.
10. CPCSEA Guideline for laboratory animal, facility, committee for
the purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals 2004, Chennai.
11. Deal CL Moskwitz RW : Nutraceuticals as
Therapeutic Agents in Osteoarthritis. The role of Glucosamine, Chonroitin Sulfate and collagen Hylysate
Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1999;
25 : 379 – 395
12. Weyland CM. New insights into the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis.
Rheumatology 2000; 39 (Suppl.1); 3-8.
13. Williams Ro. Rodent models of arthiritis
: Prelevance for human disease. Clin
Exp immunol 1998; 114 : 330-2.
14. Oyanagui Y. Anti-inflammatory effects of polyamines in serotonin and carrageenin paw edema –possible mechanisms to increase
vascular permeability inhibitory protein level which is regulated by glucocortcodis and superoxide radical. Agents action 1984:
14:123 -37.
15. Jasmin G(1967) Experimental arthritis in rats. A comprehensive review
with specific reference to mycoplasma in: Rohstein J (ed) Rheumatology
Vol.1, Karger, Basel, PP 107 -131.
Received on 09.01.2012
Modified on 18.01.2012
Accepted on 24.01.2012
© A&V Publication all right
reserved
Research J. Pharmacology and
Pharmacodynamics. 4(2): March - April, 2012, 91-93